OSAConsensus
EN 中文
Research use only. OSAConsensus is an integrated reanalysis resource for public obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) and chronic intermittent hypoxia (CIH) transcriptomic data. Despite the name, it is not a clinical consensus statement or practice guideline and provides no diagnosis or treatment advice. Every program set carries its evidence-tier label; sets that failed cross-cohort or held-out validation are labelled as such next to the data.

OSAConsensus

OSAConsensus curates every public human OSA transcriptomic series and animal CIH model series we could verify (34 GEO series, 1,032 samples, plus one external single-cell adenoid atlas), reanalyses them under one pipeline, and asks three questions with pre-registered discipline: is there a reproducible human peripheral program, does any animal CIH model reproduce the human profile, and do the answers survive leave-one-cohort-out, permutation and held-out validation? Several headline answers are negative — and they are reported as results, with the receipts on this site.

Resource at a glance

34GEO series curated & verified
1,032Samples reconciled (GSM-exact)
11 / 352Human CORE series / samples
14 / 249Animal strict-CORE series / samples
238,093Adenoid atlas cells annotated
110,535PBMC single cells (GSE214865)
24,618Per-gene cross-species response rows
22Headline conclusions adjudicated (Step 7)

Step 7 grand adjudication of the 22 headline conclusions (Steps 3–6)

19standing
2downgraded
1revoked

19 of 22 headline conclusions stand after leave-one-cohort-out, 10,000× permutation, old-platform sensitivity and held-out validation (3 of them strengthened). Two were downgraded (the P283 asset claim; the rat-lung day-7 phase claim) and one was revoked (the adipose cross-cohort consensus). The full table is on the Methods & adjudication page.

Human blood: a significant discordance, not a weak signal

Only two adult blood cohorts carry an independent OSA-vs-control contrast (GSE75097, GSE283703). Across 19,135 shared genes their logFC profiles are significantly anti-correlated (Spearman ρ = −0.070, gene-label permutation p < 1e-4; nominal-gene concordance 44.9%, significantly below chance). No FDR-level cross-cohort blood consensus program exists; the tiered sets are Tier A = 0, Tier B = 1 gene, Tier C = 17 genes.

P283: internally consistent, cross-cohort irreproducible

P283 (121 genes) is an FDR-level program of the single cohort GSE283703. Inside that cohort it is coherent (CPAP long-term reversal, CD14-monocyte localisation). In the pre-declared held-out cohort GSE293433 it failed and reversed: direction concordance 20/114 = 0.175, program score higher in healthy controls (Cohen's d = −1.22, label-permutation p = 0.988). It is labelled accordingly everywhere on this site and must not be cited as a validated OSA signature.

Held-out validation (Step 7, pre-declared): in GSE293433 this set FAILED and reversed — concordance 0.175, program score higher in healthy controls (d = −1.22). Single-cohort evidence only.

Adipose layer: cross-cohort consensus revoked (Step 7, item F-06)

The former 1,408-gene adipose Tier B set has FDR support in 0 of 1,408 genes in the second adipose cohort (GSE38792); it rests entirely on GSE135917, whose disease contrast is a global expression shift (47.3% of genes FDR-significant, median logFC −0.134). It is presented here only as a GSE135917 single-cohort set with a permanent global-shift warning; its WGCNA modules are single-cohort exploratory observations.

Animal layer: one true consensus, one honest empty set

Mouse hippocampus yields a strict two-cohort consensus of 100 genes (Tier A 14 + B 86; the genome-wide logFC correlation is ≈ 0, so the consensus rests on double-significance intersection — both facts are shown together). Mouse liver, across four cohorts, has an empty strict consensus: the signals are real but protocol/diet-specific; a 46-gene ≥3/4 sensitivity set is provided and labelled as such. At chronic endpoints the Hallmark hypoxia ssGSEA score is paradoxically down, not up (score-level statement; gene-mean logFC ≈ 0).

Cross-species bridge: pathway fidelity is negative; acute–chronic decoupling is cross-species

Animal chronic CIH pathway profiles do not reproduce the human chronic OSA blood profile (per-cohort profile correlations median r = −0.43; zero of 13 cohorts agree on all four program signs; no combination reaches permutation significance — with only 4 programs the permutation space is 24, so the ranking is positional only and no model may be called “most human-like”). The human reference profile is itself weak (no program at FDR < 0.05 in either backbone cohort) and is flagged wherever the ranking is shown. At the gene layer, the strongest true transfer is P283 × mouse lung GSE21409 (concordance 0.557, FDR 0.023, small magnitude). Acute-vs-chronic hypoxia decoupling holds in both species.

Rat lung day-7 phase claim: registry-level description

The claim that the rat-lung response concentrates at day 7 rests entirely on a 2008 microarray platform (GSE8705). Step 7 downgraded it to a registry-level description with the platform year attached.

Interactive tools (all computation runs in your browser)